|Age:||I am 20|
Goodre helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about Lady looking sex Ariel problem. Return to Book. Meet the Female Chauvinist Pig — the new brand of "empowered woman" who embraces "raunch culture" wherever she finds it. In her groundbreaking book, New York magazine writer Ariel Levy argues that, if male chauvinist pigs of years past thought of women as pieces of meat, Female Chauvinist Pigs of today are doing them one better, making sex objects of other women — and of t Meet the Female Chauvinist Pig — the new brand of "empowered woman" who embraces "raunch culture" wherever she finds it.
In her groundbreaking book, New York magazine writer Ariel Levy argues that, if male chauvinist pigs of years past thought of women as pieces of meat, Female Chauvinist Pigs of today are doing them one better, making sex objects of other women — and of themselves. Irresistibly witty and wickedly intelligent, Female Chauvinist Pigs makes the case that the rise of raunch does not represent how far women have come; it only proves how far they have left to go.
Big boobed girl ryan smiles takes hard cock up her tight
Get A Copy. Paperbacks.
Published October 3rd by Free Press first published More Details Original Title. United States of America. Other Editions Friend Reviews.
Is hooking up bad for young women?
To see what your friends thought of this book, please up. To ask other readers questions about Female Chauvinist Pigsplease up. Why does it have to pick on Pamela Anderson? She is a very intelligent and visionary lady who does not only look great, but she also has a beautiful mind and good heart. She can see and understand complexity much more than any of your superficial man-hating shrilling defeminize leaders, be it shallow writers, biased politicians, incompetent academic or corporate career ladder climbers, or heartless judges and jailors.
Feliks I suppose you're right that it didn't have to be Pamela Anderson, it could have been any D-List pop-culture Lady looking sex Ariel personality of this era.
No …more I suppose you're right that it didn't have to be Pamela Anderson, it could have been any D-List pop-culture entertainment personality of this era. No shortage of choices. Would the author's assertions have been any different if she had chosen Anna Nicole Smith?
See 1 question about Female Chauvinist Pigs…. Lists with This Book.
Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters.
See a problem?
Sort order. Sep 27, Mike rated it it was ok Shelves: feminism. I'll start with the weak parts. She's a journalist so the first part is understandable. There is one part of the book where she interviews Christie Hefner, daughter of Hugh, about her job as the CFO Lady looking sex Ariel something like that of Playboy she's the one that runs the enterprise. Christie has a really interesting response to one of Levy's questions. She says, Lady looking sex Ariel I think people who choose to pose for the magazine I'll start with the weak parts. She says, "So I think people who choose to pose for the magazine have a very definite idea of what they want to get out of it - and then they have a life and they may be an actress or a mother or a lawyer or an executive.
Putting your tush on display is still not the best way to make partner or impress the board. I think Levy is guilty of going after the wrong force. Her book is called "Female Chauvinist Pigs" equating people like Christie Hefner with someone like Hugh, who admittedly only wanted to liberate men's sexuality. What Christie accomplishes by talking about the desires of women to feel sexy in that way, she actually uses the example of a woman who was injured in a car accident and became paraplegic and posed for the magazine to regain her own sense of sexuality is exactly what Levy advocates in the conclusion.
The conclusion admits that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with posing for a magazine or stripping. The issue is when raunch culture elevates one type of Lady looking sex Ariel to the norm and demands that people conform to that norm. It is true that Playboy does this through its photography so that people don't choose how to pose, but that isn't the focus of Levy's critique if it was, it would have been awesome.
She wants to call out people instead of structures. It's quite telling that she has more contempt for Christie, then the fact that the decision for posing for the magazine makes it impossible to the board room or become partner.
Local lake ariel women
She seems to treat the latter as immutable, while the former is what constitutes blameworthiness. Also there's a huge weakness, which is the entire fifth chapter. In that chapter she begins to talk about lesbian and trans culture. Her analysis of trans issues is actually pretty offensive. She sees the decision of FTM transpeople as part of the cultural shift away from pride in being a woman. She at a point admits a lack of clarity in understanding, yet still proceeds to judge an entire group of people.
She appears to be fine with people that simply enjoy the fluid identity, but she has an issue if people opt for surgery. It's this sort of Lady looking sex Ariel bullshit in terms of identity that really makes the book weak.
Now I'll go to the strength. When she does analysis, it's downright amazing. In chapter six she does this in depth analysis on Sex and the City talking about the commodification of sex and how that constructs people to look at sex as a status symbol instead of as a fulfilling experience that one comes into with desires.
She quotes Carrie as saying, "she usually 'couldn't help but wonder; what was going on in the head of the man she was seeing and rarely evaluated her own happiness as such. The issue is when we have a standard and evaluate ourselves to the standard without considered what our own internal desires are.
She says that sex is such a unique Lady looking sex Ariel that there's no way the raunch standard fits everyone, but people play into it because of its commodification and current status as a status symbol and even power symbol. That was only one of the examples, but I really liked that one so I chose it. Each chapter had analysis and anecdotes, but the analysis is where the book is at its best.
View all 3 comments. Mar 08, Larissa rated it it was ok Shelves:non-fictionenglish-usa. Ever since I heard--or rather, speculated on--the premise of this book, I wanted to support it.
Ariel holland sex galler
Wanted to get behind the woman who was willing to lay bare all the ways in which Lady looking sex Ariel so often 'ruined it for the rest of us. It's not that her discussion shoulnd't include interviews with women who proudly sport Playboy Ever since I heard--or rather, speculated on--the premise of this book, I wanted to support it. It's not that her discussion shoulnd't include interviews with women who proudly sport Playboy bunnies, who flash 'Girls Gone Wild!
Because it should. And Levy does make some insightful points about the common equation of exhibitionist sexuality with power, as well as the manner in which women who want to set themselves above the tradtional lot and reception of their gender mask themselves in a sort of faux masculinity, deeming their traits--their favored traits--as somehow 'male.
She interviews porn stars who were raped, beaten, and abused prior to choosing their profession. She interviews Adam Corolla. And with the expected sound bytes from such individuals, who can argue with her point: women are still living in a degraded patriarchal society and they are bringing it on themselves.
What makes this assertion truly problematic is that Levy has no solution for this problem, no interviews with--or even speculations on--what a strong, healthily-sexual woman looks like. Presumably she thinks that she herself as above and outside, a paragon of liberated and feministic sexuality although she occasionally admits to falling prey to the temptation of buying into masculine privlegebut she never actaully explains what qualities she has that others lack, or how she's managed to escape the vortex of 'raunch.
It is, then, the final irony that Ariel Levy lets Lady looking sex Ariel a single sequined, tube-topped interview go by without first decribing--in great detail--the young women's hair color, innocent lips, curvaceous figure, glowing skin.
Perhaps such characterizations are intended to draw our attention to the sad irony: the inherent beauty and innocence of girls and women who think of themselves as nothing more than flesh and display. But closer observation reveals nothing more or less than ogling--the visual consumptions of a woman who likes to watch, likes to critique, but doesn't have a single answer.